Cases 11 - 20 of 882
Shannon v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv02938
Plaintiff:
Daniel A Shannon
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, William Byars, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Johnson v. Haley et al
as 2:2012cv00507
Plaintiff:
Ronald Colonial Johnson
Defendant:
Nikki Haley, Mark Sanford, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosby v. Ozmint et al
as 1:2012cv00440
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Crosby
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, John-Jane 1 Doe, John-Jane 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Laubshire et al
as 6:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
M V Laubshire, William R Byars, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beckham v. Byars et al
as 6:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
Stephen A Beckham
Defendant:
William Byars, Carl Frederick, Daniel J Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Ozmint
as 0:2011cv03277
Petitioner:
Jody Lynn Ward
Respondent:
Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. The South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv03220
Plaintiff:
David James
Defendant:
Robert E Ward, William Byers, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv02770
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Glenn, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon Ozmint, Leroy Cartledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Ozmint et al
as 0:2011cv02406
Plaintiff:
James Graham
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint , Willie L Eagleton , Warden Chavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilcox v. Ozmint et al
as 9:2011cv02073
Plaintiff:
Marshall Frank Wilcox
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint , William R Byars, Jr , John R Pate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
