Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Terry v. Frame
as 2:2024cv00735
Respondent:
Superintendent Jonathan Frame
Plaintiff:
Charles Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rydbom v. McKinney et al
as 2:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Dennis Rydbom
Defendant:
Jonathan Frame, Derek McKinney, William Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 24-6407
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Defendant:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, JONATHAN FRAME, AWS, ANDY MITCHELL and others
Williams v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams
Defendant:
William Marshall, Jarrod Wilson, Jonathan Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wentz v. Ames et al
as 2:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Wentz
Defendant:
Superintendent Donald Ames, Asso. Superintendent Jonathan Frame, Major Josh Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chester v. Jividen et al.
as 2:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Chester
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Donald Ames, Jonathan Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holbrook v. Sandy et al
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Tex Gene Holbrook, II
Defendant:
Jeff Sandy, Betsy Jividen, Donnie Ames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Jividen et al
as 2:2020cv00324
Defendant:
Jonathan Frame, David Ballard, Chad Hamby and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Marice Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 20-6454
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH COOPER, Psy. Dr./MHU Staff, SHANNON COLEMAN, MHU Staff, KEN BOWLIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Worley v. Ewing et al
as 2:2019cv00543
Defendant:
Jonathan Frame, Charles Johnston, Betsy Jividen and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Worley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
