Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Wade Jackson v. Jonathan Roundtree, et al
as 09-31222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE P JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN ROUNDTREE, Medical Director, LADD, Doctor, ABRAMS, Doctor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-31219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carlos McGrew v. Jonathan Roundtree, et al
as 09-31206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS MCGREW
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN ROUNDTREE, Dr., MIKE THOMAS, Emergency Medical Technician, ANTHONY MCCOY, also known as Unknown McCoy, Emergency Medical Technician and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jackson v. Roundtree et al
as 3:2009cv00163
Plaintiff:
Wade P. Jackson
Defendant:
Jonathan Roundtree, Unknown Ladd, Unknown Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brumfield v. Cain, et al
as 08-31015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHEDRICK BRUMFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
N BURL CAIN, LINDA RAMSEY, RICHARD STALDER and others
Wilson v. Cain et al
as 3:2008cv00475
Plaintiff:
Lacal L. Wilson
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Jonathan Roundtree, Roman Singh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brumfield v. Cain et al
as 3:2008cv00148
Plaintiff:
Shedrick J. Brumfield
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Linda Ramsey, Richard Stalder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demouchette v. Roundtree et al
as 3:2008cv00050
Plaintiff:
Preston G Demouchette, Jr
Defendant:
Jonathan Roundtree and James Sylvester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.