Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Contreras v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80462
Plaintiff:
Jorge Contreras
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Promeco S.A .de C.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Contreras v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jorge Contreras
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Pfizer Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CONTRERAS v. CORPORATE COACHES, INC. et al
as 0:2021cv62142
Plaintiff:
JORGE CONTRERAS
Defendant:
CORPORATE COACHES, INC. and LAURIE BARDER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Westfall v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 1:2021cv00283
Defendant:
Erica Powell, Claudia Llamas, Elizabeth Anshutz and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Westfall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. City of Modesto Police Dept. et al
as 2:2020at00726
Defendant:
Dustin Espinoza, Galen L. Carroll, Jorge Contreras and others
Plaintiff:
Lizet Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lizet Gonzalez v. City of Modesto Police Dept. et al
as 1:2020cv01031
Defendant:
Dustin Espinoza, City of Modesto-Modesto Police Department, Galen L. Carroll and others
Plaintiff:
Lizet Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
(DP) Contreras v. Davis
as 1:2019cv01523
Respondent:
Ronald Davis
Petitioner:
Jorge Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jorge Contreras v. Jay Christianson
as 19-35656
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE CONTRERAS
Respondent / Appellee:
JAY CHRISTIANSON
United States of America v. Contreras et al
as 3:2019cv00264
Defendant:
Jorge Contreras, Jr and Capital One, NA
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Contreras v. Christianson
as 1:2019cv00098
Respondent:
Jay Christianson
Petitioner:
Jorge Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
