Cases 1 - 10 of 56
USA v. Jorge Monteagudo
as 23-6065
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JORGE GONZALEZ MONTEAGUDO
Gonzalez Morales v. Garland
as 23-1942
Petitioner:
JORGE GONZALEZ MORALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
John W. Sigler v. Jorge Gonzalez et al
as 8:2022cv02325
Plaintiff:
John W. Sigler
Defendant:
Jorge Gonzalez, USAA Casualty Insurance Company, Interinsurance Exchange of Automobile Club of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Gonzalez
as 22-20481
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jorge Gonzalez
Miracle Life Farm, LLC v. Hialeah Tomatoes and Fresh Produce, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv22862
Plaintiff:
Miracle Life Farm, LLC
Defendant:
Hialeah Tomatoes and Fresh Produce, Inc. and Jorge Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0499 Agricultural Commodities Act
United States of America v. Conyers (Moye)
as 21-1022
Defendant:
Corey Canteen, Ramel Matthews, AKA Rah, Michael Brown, AKA Mighty and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jason Moye, AKA Tall Jay
Appellee:
United States of America
United States of America v. Conyers (Belle)
as 21-544
Defendant:
Corey Canteen, Ramel Matthews, AKA Rah, Michael Brown, AKA Mighty and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Wendell Belle, AKA Delly Dell
Appellee:
United States of America
United States of America v. Conyers (Vanderpool)
as 20-3521
Defendant:
Corey Canteen, Ramel Matthews, AKA Rah, Michael Brown, AKA Mighty and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Kerry Vanderpool, AKA Paperz
Jose Gonzalez v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60482
Petitioner:
JOSE JORGE GONZALEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
