Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Marin et al
as 2:2025cv05089
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Jose Marin doing business as d/b/a Casa Honduras, Jose Alvarado doing business as d/b/a Casa Honduras and Ceiba Restaurant Inc. doing business as an unknown business entity d/b/a Casa Honduras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Alvarado-Ramos v. Bondi
as 25-346
Petitioner:
AYRTON JOSE ALVARADO-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, JAMES R. MCHENRY, III, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL and PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alvarado v. Relevance International, LLC
as 1:2025cv00006
Defendant:
Relevance International, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jose Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Alvarado v. SEScoops LLC
as 9:2024cv80769
Defendant:
SEScoops LLC
Plaintiff:
Jose Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jose Alvarado v. Salem Media Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02905
Plaintiff:
Jose Alvarado
Defendant:
Salem Media Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jose Alvarado et al v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Jose Alvarado, Jimena Alvarado, Erika Alvarado and others
Defendant:
City of San Bernardino and Does 1-10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
