Cases 1 - 10 of 20
GONZALEZ v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
JOSE GONZALEZ
Defendant:
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
GONZALEZ v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
JOSE GONZALEZ
Defendant:
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
GONZALEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
JOSE GONZALEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, TERRELL FELTS, JEAN CASTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GONZALEZ v. MURIN et al
as 1:2017cv00324
Plaintiff:
JOSE GONZALEZ
Defendant:
MURIN, CLOUSER, GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAM'S MIDTOWN GROUP, INC. v. GONZALEZ et al
as 2:2015cv01998
Plaintiff:
SAM'S MIDTOWN GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
JOSE GONZALEZ and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
GONZALEZ-RIVERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv03400
Plaintiff:
JOSE GONZALEZ-RIVERA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BATTS et al v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2012cv06717
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT A. BATTS, CHAL KENNEDY, MICHAEL MCCRAY and others
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 1:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
JOSE GONZALEZ
Defendant:
CHERYL GILL and MICHAEL W. HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALEZ v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2012cv01073
Petitioner:
JOSE GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL W. HARLOW and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GONZALEZ v. PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2012cv00464
Plaintiff:
JOSE GONZALEZ
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ERIE COUNTY REGIONAL CONTRACT JAIL ALBION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
