Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Gomez-Perez v. Garland
as 22-1478
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS GOMEZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomez Basurto et al v. TSG 89 Corp et al
as 1:2018cv06827
Defendant:
George Santis, Ari Doe, TSG 89 Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Gomez Basurto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Jose Gomez-Perez
as 17-41083
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS GOMEZ-PEREZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bautista et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv23815
Plaintiff:
Santiago Gomez Bautista and Jose Luis Gomez
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc., Mitsubishi Motors Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Bautista et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv02842
Plaintiff:
Santiago Gomez Bautista and Jose Luis Gomez
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc, Mitsubishi Motors Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Todd Castillo et al v. City of Compton et al
as 2:2016cv02863
Plaintiff:
Todd Castillo, Jose Luis Gomez, Staci Lipsey and others
Defendant:
City of Compton and Does
Lejeune et al v. Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00396
Defendant:
ABC Insurance Company, Action Resources, Inc., Miguel Aguirre and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene A. Lejeune and Tara Lejeune
Notice Only:
William H. Priestly, Jr. and Scott L. Zimmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gunsolus et al v. HRR Trucking, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2014cv00065
Plaintiff:
Harold Louis Gunsolus and Rene Gunsolus
Defendant:
HRR Trucking, L.L.C. , TUM Logistics Carrier Division, Inc. and Jose Luis Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
