Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jose Madrigal v. Ferguson Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Jose Madrigal
Defendant:
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC, Does 1 through 25 and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Madrigal v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03125
Plaintiff:
Jose Madrigal
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DeMoss et al v. City of Visalia
as 1:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
Zachary DeMoss, William Qualls, Will Binder and others
Defendant:
City of Visalia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
DeMoss et al v. City of Visalia, California
as 1:2022at00589
Plaintiff:
Zachary DeMoss, William Qualls, Will Binder and others
Defendant:
City of Visalia, California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jose Madrigal v. United States
as 2:2019cv05041
Defendant:
United States and DOES 1-100
Plaintiff:
Jose Madrigal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Jaime et al v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2019cv08367
Defendant:
CRAIG CEDERGREN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, DOES 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIELA COVARRUBIAS and JOSE JAIME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madrigal v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana et al
as 7:2016cv00295
Plaintiff:
Jose Madrigal
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana and Matthew Considine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madrigal v. Post Conviction Assistance Cntr et al
as 3:2015cv02555
Plaintiff:
Jose Madrigal
Defendant:
Post Conviction Assistance Cntr, Amy C. Kaye and Christa M. Hohmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madrigal v. Jim Fruitt Trucking, Inc. et al
as 2:2013at01346
Plaintiff:
Jose Madrigal
Defendant:
Jim Fruitt Trucking, Inc. and Charley Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
