Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2023cv00915
Petitioner:
Gimy Jose Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS UNION LOCAL 30 COMBINED ANNUITY FUND v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2019cv01219
Defendant:
ROBERT LEE, JR., CHARLES TAYLOR and JOSE RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS UNION LOCAL 30 COMBINED ANNUITY FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
CLOUSE et al v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 5:2015cv04817
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CLOUSE and MARGARET HARRISON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, JOSE RODRIGUEZ, TINA KAMINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez-Crespo v. Thomas
as 3:2012cv00859
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez-Crespo
Respondent:
Jeffrey Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOWARD et al v. WAGNER et al
as 5:2010cv05019
Plaintiff:
HAROLD HOWARD, CHIMAR RODGERS, NELSON LEON and others
Defendant:
GEORGE WAGNER, CHRISTI RESSLER, KEVIN NEFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2010cv00184
Plaintiff:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
DEL-ROSARIO-PAGAN et al v. GLAXO SMITH KLINE, PLC et al
as 2:2007cv04984
Plaintiff:
MARIA DEL-ROSARIO-PAGAN, EVA M. RODRIGUEZ, CARMEN CORREA and others
Defendant:
GLAXO SMITH KLINE, PLC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv03512
Plaintiff:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, METLIFE DISABILITY and HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
