Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Favors v. First Premier Bank
as 0:2025cv02108
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant:
First Premier Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Favors v. Walkenhorst et al
as 0:2024cv03934
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe Representatives and Walkenhorst
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Favors v. Jodi Harpstead
as 24-2959
Respondent:
Jodi Harpstead
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Favors v. Davis et al
as 0:2024cv03303
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, John Doe, Marcus Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Favors v. Lanin et al
as 0:2024cv02709
Defendant:
Mike Lanin, Jodi Hardstead and Nancy Johnston
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Favors v. Harpstead
as 0:2023cv01647
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Respondent:
Jodi Harpstead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Favors v. Reese et al
as 0:2022cv01276
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant:
Ryan Reese, Stephie Miller, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Favors v. Jodi Harpstead, et al
as 22-1018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant / Appellee:
Jodi Harpstead, Individual/Official Capacities and as Commissioner of DHS/MSOP; And their successors in interest, Nancy Johnston, Individual/Official Capacities and as Executive Director of MSOP; And their successors in interest, Bryan Lake, Individual/Official Capacities and as SRB Chair Person; And their successors in interest and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
