Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Anthony Testa v. Doe Potato, et al
as 22-3246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY J. TESTA, Executor
Defendant / Appellee:
DOE POTATO, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
TESTA v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 3:2021cv18569
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TESTA v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 3:2021cv02761
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF THE FBI, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, COMMISSIONER OF THE IRS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TESTA v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 3:2020cv07050
Defendant:
DOE AGENT IN CHARGE, FBI NEWARK, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TESTA v. DOE POTATO et al
as 3:2020cv05511
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DOE IMMEDIATE SUPERVISORS OF FBI AGENT JAMES SIMPSON, JACK HOBAN, JOSEPH ACHACOSO, DOE AGENT IN CHARGE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Testa et al v. Hoban et al
as 3:2017cv01618
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Defendant:
JACK HOBAN, JOSEPH ACHACOSO, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cross_claimant:
The Township of Union, NJ , The Police Department of Union TWP., NJ and Manuel Figuieredo
Cross_defendant:
JOSEPH ACHACOSO, RAS BARAKA, Bernards Township, NJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Testa et al v. Hoban et al
as 1:2016cv08748
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Testa
Defendant:
Jack Hoban, Joseph Achacoso, The Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514
TESTA v. HOBAN et al
as 3:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Defendant:
JACK HOBAN, JOSEPH ACHACOSO, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
