Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cotto, et al v. Campbell, et al
as 23-2069
Plaintiff:
STACY FOSTER, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JAMIE KIMBALL, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JONATHAN RILEY, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, Attorney General, TIMOTHY SHUGRUE, Berkshire County District Attorney and others
Larkin v. Christie et al
as 1:2019cv01024
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Nueces County Sherriff, TX, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Larkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mino v. Alicea et al
as 4:2016cv40160
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mino
Defendant:
Geraldo Alicea, James Lemire, Charles Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mierzejewski v. Mandell et al
as 4:2014cv40004
Plaintiff:
Randall H. Mierzejewski
Defendant:
Andrew L Mandell, Elliott L. Zide, Joseph D. Early, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2013cv40074
Plaintiff:
David Morse Phillips
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, City of Worcester, Joseph D. Early and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McCullen, et al v. Coakley, et al
as 12-1334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELEANOR MCCULLEN, JEAN BLACKBURN ZARRELLA, GREGORY A. SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTHA COAKLEY, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, DANIEL F. CONLEY, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Suffolk County, JOSEPH D. EARLY, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Worcester County and others
:
, , and others
Andre, Jr. v. Moriarty, et al
as 11-1945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD K. ANDRE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MORIARTY, Judge, LEMIRE, Judge, GUY W. GLODIS, Sheriff and others
Andre v. Moriarty et al
as 4:2011cv40009
Plaintiff:
Donald K Andre, Jr.
Defendant:
Moriarty , Lemire , Guy Glodis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
