Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 170
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01627
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party: JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner: MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated, JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Bannon v. Godin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv11501
Defendant: Brenda Figueroa, The City of Boston, Leroy Fernandes and others
Plaintiff: Jennifer Root Bannon
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee: STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated, MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated, MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Cruz Millan, et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance, et al
as 20-1499
Plaintiff: EFRAIN BURGOS LOPEZ, JONATHAN ZHENG, A.S.C., minor represented by Luis Carrion-Lopez and others
Interested Party: MANUEL BATISTA-DE LA ROSA, SHIRLEY A. TEJADA
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANCES T. SERRA MORALES, O.M.S., minor 3 represented by Orlando Morales and Quetcy Soler, G.C.L., minor 2 represented by Manuel Morales and Yadira Leon and others
Defendant: MULTINATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, HF ENGINEERING CONSULTING GROUP, PSC, G2 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for Doral Bank
Wardingly v. Inch et al
as 2:2020cv00323
Plaintiff: Edward Wardingly
Defendant: FNU McCain, Mark Inch, FNU Holm and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00654
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10635
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
FIGUEROA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33688
Defendant: 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: CARLOS JOSEPH FIGUEROA
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?