Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Amirul El v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2023cv12587
Plaintiff:
Mikhael Amirul El
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Kinloch Jonathan, Timothy Kenny and others
Claimant:
Mikhael Amirul El Trust and Michael Anthony Bryant, TTEE
Merithew v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2023cv11713
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scott Merithew
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Joseph Gasper
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Doe v. Whitmer et al
as 2:2022cv10516
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Col. Joseph Gasper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe A et al v. Whitmer et al
as 2:2022cv10209
Plaintiff:
John Doe A, John Doe B, John Doe C and others
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Joseph Gasper
Interested Party:
Alyson Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mullins v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2021cv00821
Plaintiff:
Thomas Franklin Mullins
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Joseph Gasper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2021cv00822
Plaintiff:
Reginald Timothy Bradshaw
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Joseph Gasper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lees v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2021cv00820
Plaintiff:
Richard Gail Lees
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Joseph Gasper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Gasper
as 1:2021cv00653
Plaintiff:
William Sim Spencer
Defendant:
Joseph Gasper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
