Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ayala et al v. City of Medford
as 1:2022cv10115
Plaintiff:
Noel Ayala, Antonio Alvia, John Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Palladino v. Notre Dame High School
as 1:2021cv00563
Plaintiff:
Joseph Palladino
Defendant:
Notre Dame High School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Orpilla et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11289
Plaintiff:
Michael Orpilla, Miguel Quinones, Peter Panariello and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
In re: South Coast Oil Corporation, et al, et al
as 12-56043
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SOUTH COAST OIL CORPORATION
Appellant:
JOSEPH M. PALLADINO, inidividually and in his capacity as Trustee for the Alfred Joseph Palladino 1994 Trust, BG OPERATIONS, LLC and BG/ANGUS JOINT VENTURE
Appellee:
E & B NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, CORP., ELYSIUM WEST, LLC and JAMES J. JOSEPH, Trustee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-56014
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: South Coast Oil Corporation
as 12-55365
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SOUTH COAST OIL CORPORATION
Appellant:
JOSEPH M. PALLADINO, individually and in his capacity as Trustee for the Alfred Joseph Palladino 1994 Trust and BG OPERATIONS, LLC, a California limited liability company
Appellee:
SOUTH COAST OIL CORPORATION, DANIEL TOE, JAMES J. JOSEPH, Trustee and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-55147
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-55146
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
