Cases 1 - 10 of 19
MASCAL v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MASCAL
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LONG CREEK YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER, JOSEPH PONTE and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNOWLES v. PONTE et al
as 2:2021cv00108
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE KNOWLES
Defendant:
HEATHER E CHARRON, GUY W TINKHAM, EDWARD O'CONNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOURNIER v. LEPAGE et al
as 1:2014cv00351
Plaintiff:
FRANK DANIEL FOURNIER
Defendant:
PAUL LEPAGE, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, JOSEPH PONTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REESE v. BOUFFARD et al
as 1:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
GEOFFREY REESE
Defendant:
ROBERT BOUFFARD, MIKE TAUSEK, TONY MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv00476
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH PONTE, MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONAGHAN et al v. PONTE
as 1:2013cv00395
Plaintiff:
AMANDA MONAGHAN and JOHNATHAN JAMES MONAGHAN
Defendant:
JOSEPH PONTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. NICHOLS et al
as 1:2013cv00259
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WALKER
Defendant:
RALPH NICHOLS, PATRICIA BARNHART, SCOTT BURNHEIMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEAN v. BARNHART et al
as 1:2013cv00196
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BEAN
Defendant:
PATRICIA BARNHART and JOSEPH PONTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUTCHINSON v. PONTE
as 1:2012cv00321
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HUTCHINSON
Respondent:
JOSEPH PONTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOULTON v. PONTE et al
as 1:2012cv00259
Plaintiff:
JASON C MOULTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH PONTE, PATRICIA BARNHART and JOANNA SYLVESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
