Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Chafin v. Caudill et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff: Christopher Chafin
Defendant: Steve Caudill, Superintendent Jason Hutson, Joseph Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richison v. Chapman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00771
Plaintiff: Rebecca Richison
Defendant: CO Aaron Chapman, CO Joel Hammer, CO Ashley Husk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29376
Plaintiff: JOSEPH WOOD
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15912
Plaintiff: JOSEPH WOODS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ryan Francisco v. Timothy Tibbs
as 23-6850
Plaintiff / Appellant: RYAN FRANCISCO
Defendant / Appellee: TIMOTHY TIBBS, MICHAEL COSTELLO, SHANNON SAMS and others
Falcon Owens v. Timothy Tibbs
as 23-6855
Plaintiff / Appellant: FALCON OWENS
Defendant / Appellee: TIMOTHY TIBBS, MICHAEL COSTELLO, SHANNON SAMS and others
David Eakle v. Timothy Tibbs
as 23-6854
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID EAKLE
Defendant / Appellee: TIMOTHY TIBBS, MICHAEL COSTELLO, SHANNON SAMS and others
Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00057
Plaintiff: Daniel Joseph Woods
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Woods v. Tynon
as 22-2974
Petitioner / Appellant: Joseph Woods
Respondent / Appellee: Teresa Tynon, Superintendent
Eakle v. Tibbs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00219
Plaintiff: David Eakle
Defendant: Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?