Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Clark v. USA
as 7:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
Joshua Clark
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
James v. East Baton Rouge City Parish et al
as 3:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James and Conner A. James
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge City Parish, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Joshua Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
James v. Clark
as 22-30806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael A. James
Defendant / Appellee:
Joshua Clark, Jordan Webb, Nathan Harrison and others
James et al v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James, Conner A. James, Michael A James, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Joshua Clark, Jordan Webb, Nathan Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Richmond Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Henry Desean Adams
Defendant:
Richmond Police Department, Joshua Clark and C. Groge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021ct03187
Plaintiff:
Joshua Clark
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knighton v. Hartman et al
as 3:2021cv00765
Defendant:
Feder, Nigal Rodney, Mallory Muzykaski and others
Plaintiff:
Ray Anthony Knighton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Blocker v. Joel Solis et al
as 2:2020cv11764
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Joel Solis, Correctional Officer Ricardo Chirinos, Correctional Officer Joshua Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins et al v. Bladen County Detention Center
as 5:2020ct03331
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilkins, Clifton Hyland, Jerrell Taylor and others
Defendant:
Bladen County Detention Center, Admin. David Shaw, Chief Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Toby et al
as 1:2017cv04182
Petitioner:
Joshua Clark
Respondent:
Annettia Toby and Chris Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
