Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Fatir et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2018cv00933
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir, Malachai DeBruce, Antonio R. Bailey and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Dana Metzger, Jane Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Detlef Hartmann v. Thomas Carroll, et al
as 10-3069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DETLEF F. HARTMANN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS CARROLL, Warden, JOHN SCRANTON, STANLEY TAYLOR, Commissioner and others
Estate of Louis W. Chance, Jr. v. Jose Aramburo
as 08-4220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF LOUIS W. CHANCE, JR.
Defendant - Non-Participating:
JOSE A. ARAMBURO, FIRST CORR MED INC and NIRANJANA J. SHAH
Defendant - Appellee:
STANLEY TAYLOR and JOYCE TALLEY
Austin v. Taylor et al
as 1:2008cv00204
Plaintiff:
Charles Austin
Defendant:
Stanley W. Taylor, Jr., Carl C. Danberg, Raphael Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutt et al v. Taylor et al
as 1:2008cv00184
Plaintiff:
J. Anthony Hutt, J. Anthony Hutt, Theodore T. Marek and others
Defendant:
Stanley W Taylor, Jr, Carl C. Danberg, Raphael Williams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maldonado v. First Correctional Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00063
Plaintiff:
Daniel Maldonado
Defendant:
First Correctional Medical Inc., Correctional Medical Services, Jose A. Aramburo, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Ronald W. Trotman et al v. First Correctional Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00062
Plaintiff:
Estate of Ronald W. Trotman, Estate of Ronald W. Trotman, Charlotte A. Waite and others
Defendant:
First Correctional Medical Inc., Jose A. Aramburo, Jr., Sitta Gombeh-Ali and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francis v. Carroll et al
as 1:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
William Francis, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas Carroll, Correctional Medical Services, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
