Cases 1 - 10 of 188
Reis v. Castillo-Torres et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
William Reis
Defendant:
Juan Castillo Torres and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Torres v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01146
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Torres
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nunez Torres v. Walmart Stores Inc
as 2:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
Juan Nunez-Torres and Juan Nunez Torres
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Walmart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1182 Inadmissible Aliens: Defend. Denial of Pla. Appl. for Alien Employment Cer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01046
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Torres v. Spaulding
as 3:2022cv01701
Petitioner:
Juan R. Torres
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TORRES-ROQUE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13690
Plaintiff:
JUAN JOSE TORRESROQUE and JUAN JOSE TORRES-ROQUE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
