Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hyde Rhodes v. Wilcox
as 24-1224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JEFFREY WILCOX, JUDGE JAY WINWARD, STATE OF UTAH and others
Hyde Rhodes v. Idaho Health Welfare
as 24-1225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO HEALTH WELFARE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROBERT CROWLEY, JIM MASON, Casa 7 and others
Hyde Rhodes v. Wilcox
as 24-1227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JEFFREY WILCOX and JUDGE JAY WINWARD
Hyde Rhodes v. Wilcox
as 24-1229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JEFFREY WILCOX, JUDGE JAY WINWARD and STATE OF UTAH
Chisena v. Major League Baseball Players Association
as 23-2073
Appellant:
MICHAEL P. CHISENA
Appellee:
MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION and AARON JUDGE
Atkins v. Sykes
as 21-2344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE DIANE S. SYKES, JUDGE WILLIAM J. BAUER, JUDGE JOEL M. FLAUM and others
Atkins v. Stivers
as 21-2271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF JUDGE GREG N. STIVERS, JUDGE DAVID J. HALE, JUDGE REBECCA GRADY JENNINGS and others
Point Conversions, LLC v. Lopane
as 21-1713
Plaintiff / Appellant:
POINT CONVERSIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE NICHOLAS LOPANE, in his official capacity as judge in the state of Florida
In re: Drevaleva
as 20-149
Petitioner:
In re: TATYANA E. DREVALEVA
Respondent:
LAUREL BEELER, in her individual capacity as a Magistrate Judge of the District Court for Northern California, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA and UNITED STATES
CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH V. KAPPOS
as 11-1041
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish and Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant-Appellee:
David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Harry I. Moatz, Director, Office of Enrollment & Discipline, PTO, United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
