Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 156
Murray v. Parlow et al
as 6:2024cv00190
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Patricia Parlow, Lane County DAs Office, Erick Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Zennache et al
as 6:2024cv00193
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Judge Charles M. Zennache, Lane County DAs Office, Erick T. Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craigen v. Gushwa et al
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff: George W. Craigen
Defendant: Dean Gushwa, Elizabeth Baker, O.P.D.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Hassler et al
as 6:2024cv00071
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Christin Hassler, Supervizer Dasiy, Judge to Be Named and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Conovers
as 6:2024cv00075
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Judge Conovers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. McAlpin et al
as 6:2024cv00065
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Judge McAlpin, Erik T Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. DA's Office et al
as 6:2024cv00041
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: DA's Office, Erik T. Knap, Judge McAlpine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01899
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Champagne v. Taite
as 2:2023cv01717
Plaintiff: Michael Champagne
Defendant: Judge Eric Taite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipka v. Immergut et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01700
Plaintiff: Joshua S. Lipka
Defendant: Judge Karin J. Immergut, Bostwick, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?