Cases 1 - 10 of 796
Jones v. Skullcandy
as 2:2025cv00184
Plaintiff:
Julie Jones
Defendant:
Skullcandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
SPENCE v. JONES et al
as 3:2025cv00184
Plaintiff:
LINFORD R SPENCE
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, MARK INCH, RICKY DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASEY v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00426
Defendant:
MORROW, PRIDGEON, RICKY DIXON and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M CASEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 4:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DARRELL DANIELS
Defendant:
TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, JULIE JONES, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Grant
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Corizon Health, Inc. a Missouri Limited Liability Company doing business as Tehum Care Services, Inc., Centurion of Florida, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. WalMart, Inc.
as 1:2023cv14339
Plaintiff:
Julie Jones
Defendant:
WalMart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: Derrick Allen
as 23-13068
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK ALLEN
Respondent:
J SANTIAGO, WARDEN, A. MOLINA and others
CONEY v. JONES et al
as 4:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
BILLY JESUS CONEY
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARVIN FUDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Tonal Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
Julie Jones
Defendant:
Tonal Systems, Inc. and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Derrick AllenIn re: Derrick Allen
as 23-11961
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK ALLEN
Respondent:
J. SANTIAGO, C. MAIRANA, A. MOLINA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
