Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Miller et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv02713
Plaintiff:
Debra Miller and Barbel Shuman
Defendant:
Marvin R. Jones , K&B Transportation, Inc. and Harco National Insurance Company
Lundborg v. Weiss
as 1:2013cv00955
Plaintiff:
Patricia L Lundborg
Defendant:
Edward Weiss and K&B Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Adams v. K & B Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00966
Plaintiff:
Deborah Adams
Defendant:
K & B Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Frey v. Turner et al
as 1:2011cv02514
Plaintiff:
Merle A. Frey
Defendant:
David W. Turner and K&B Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. K & B Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00839
Plaintiff:
Deborah Adams
Defendant:
K & B Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PJC Logistics, LLC v. Anderson Trucking Service, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv00675
Plaintiff:
PJC Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Anderson Trucking Service, Inc., Annett Holdings, Inc., Barr-Nunn Transportation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv50022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Ruhl v. Powers, et al
as 08-3133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN A. RUHL
Defendant:
DAVID H. POWERS, K & B TRANSPORT, INC. and CHEROKEE INSURANCE COMPANY
Intervenor - Appellant:
BUILDING CONTROLS AND SERVICE and ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE COMPANY
Wood v. Cottengim et al
as 6:2007cv01383
Plaintiff:
Loran E. Wood and Loran E. Wood
Defendant:
Jason D. Cottengim, K&B Transportation, Inc. and Harco National Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ruhl v. Powers et al
as 6:2007cv01084
Plaintiff:
John A. Ruhl and John A. Ruhl
Defendant:
David H. Powers, David H. Powers, David H. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
