Cases 1 - 10 of 289
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv60164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Harris et al v. Durham et al
as 6:2025cv03002
Defendant:
Sandra Durham and James Durham
Plaintiff:
Myla Walker, Michele K. Harris and Edgar S. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Pattison v. NDOC/AGO RICO Enterprise et al
as 3:2025cv00002
Defendant:
NDOC/AGO RICO Enterprise, Sandra Walker, C. Dutton and others
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. KING
as 1:2024cv02238
Plaintiff:
BRENDA K. HARRIS
Defendant:
MICHELLE KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Williams v. Squeo et al
as 1:2024cv08854
Defendant:
A. Squeo, M Herrera, Jerrell Danner, III and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rishard H. Amadi Salaam v. Glenn E. Pratt et al
as 5:2024cv01905
Defendant:
Fernando Franco, R. Rusow, J. Thorpe and others
Plaintiff:
Rishard H. Amadi Salaam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. King et al
as 3:2024cv00497
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Smith, Superintendent Ronald King, Nurse Unknown Phillips and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jerome K. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toney v. Navarette et al
as 1:2024cv07430
Plaintiff:
Kyton Toney
Defendant:
Michelle K. Harris and Rubi Navarette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Rishard Amadi Salaam et al v. Glen E. Pratt et al
as 5:2024cv01568
Defendant:
Howard E. Moseley, Fernando Franco, R. Rusow and others
Plaintiff:
Rishard H. Amadi Salaam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Kermit Harris
as 24-3082
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KERMIT B. HARRIS, aka Brian K. Harris
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
