Cases 1 - 10 of 1,847
Skeens v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Lindsay K Skeens
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services, Inc. and Raising Cane's USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Bowen v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Joshua K. Bowen
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klein v. The County of Chesterfield et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Kenneth F. Klein, III
Defendant:
The County of Chesterfield, A. Resnick, M. S. Znotens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington Jr. v. Stafford County Sheriffs Office
as 1:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Randull K. Washington Jr.
Defendant:
Stafford County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington, Jr. v. SMK Law Group
as 1:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Randull K. Washington, Jr.
Defendant:
SMK Law Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. VADOC et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Taiveon Tucker
Defendant:
VADOC, Dunlevy, Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
