Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kinnel v. Tunica County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Tunica County, Mississippi, Sheriff K. C. Hamp, Jailer Sharon Hargrow and others
Plaintiff:
Tanyatta Kinnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Hamp et al
as 3:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Vincent Morgan
Defendant:
Tunica County Sheriff K. C. Hamp and Reginald Boykin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Tunica County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2016cv00182
Plaintiff:
Angela White
Defendant:
Tunica County, Mississippi, Tunica County, Mississippi Sheriff's Department, K. C. Hamp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Hamp et al
as 3:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
Tony Smith
Defendant:
K. C. Hamp, John Doe Sheriff's Deputies and Tunica County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. Tunica County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2010cv00202
Plaintiff:
Earnest Bradley
Defendant:
Tunica County, Mississippi and K. C. Hamp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. U. S. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Young
Defendant:
U. S. Department of Justice, Jim M. Greenlee, Tunica County Mississippi Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fleming v. Tunica County et al
as 2:2009cv00011
Plaintiff:
Hosey Fleming
Defendant:
Tunica County, K. C. Hamp, Charlie Wright and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Price v. Tunica County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2008cv00262
Plaintiff:
Bernard Price
Defendant:
Tunica County, Mississippi, James Dunn, Cedrick Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Hamp et al
as 2:2008cv00237
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Thomas
Defendant:
K. C. Hamp, John Does 1-10, Clifton Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
