Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Clark et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-13047
Plaintiff:
Sharon G. Clark and John K. Clark
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Coulthard et al v. Trott & Trott, PC et al
as 2:2012cv13601
Plaintiff:
Alan Coulthard and Ann Coulthard
Defendant:
Trott & Trott, PC , David A. Trott , Christopher S Astfalk and others
United States of America v. Clark
as 12-1221
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeremiah K. Clark
Kelley et al v. National Fitness Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
Richard Kelley and Laura Kelley
Defendant:
National Fitness Center, Inc., Dimitra K Clark, Optima Recovery Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Robert Hackworth, Jr. v. K. Clark
as 10-70400
Petitioner:
ROBERT HACKWORTH, Jr.
Respondent:
K. CLARK
Abraham et al v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02844
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Abraham, Keith Abraham, Yolanda Aguirre and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Ruchell Cinque Magee v. K. Clark
as 2:2009cv05784
Petitioner:
Ruchell Cinque MaGee
Defendant:
K. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lorigo v. Clark et al
as 1:2008cv00972
Petitioner:
Ronald Jay Lorigo
Respondent:
K. Clark , California Board of Parole Hearings and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schaufenbuel et al v. InvestForClosures Financial, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2009cv01221
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Schaufenbuel, Robert N Schaufenbuel, John Reed, IV and others
Defendant:
InvestForClosures Financial, L.L.C., ROI Developers, InvestForClosures and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ricky Bernoudy v. K. Clark
as 09-70509
Petitioner:
RICKY DARNELL BERNOUDY
Respondent:
K. CLARK, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
