Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Khalifah Saif'ullah v. Ron Bloomfield, et al
as 23-15058
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KHALIFAH E.D. SAIF'ULLAH, AKA Fernando A Jackson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
RON BLOOMFIELD, Acting Warden, in his Official and Individual capacity, TRENT ALLEN, Associate Warden, in his Official and Individual capacity, K. J. ALLEN, Appeals Examiner, in his Official and Individual capacity and others
Saif'ullah v. Bloomfield et al
as 5:2020cv04109
Defendant:
Associate Warden Trent Allen, CBMI Nicele C Burgess, Maintenance Mechanic Basilio Rasales and others
Plaintiff:
Khalifah E.D. Saif'ullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre L. Revis v. Stuart Sherman et al
as 2:2019cv06626
Defendant:
T. Jones, S. Kane, K. J. Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Revis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard Eugene Ward v. M. H. Valadez et al
as 3:2019cv01267
Defendant:
G. Bowen, M. H. Valadez, Armando Favila and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Eugene Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Sherman v. Lizarraga et al
as 2:2019cv00569
Defendant:
A. Krouse, K. J. Allen, J. Lyman and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Glenn Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Schrubb, Sr. v. Jager, et al
as 18-16351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN R. SCHRUBB, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAGER, Officer, D. RUSK, HOFFMAN and others
Canada v. Spearman et al
as 4:2018cv03499
Plaintiff:
James E Canada
Defendant:
M.E. Spearman, P. Santiago, M. Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Lewis et al
as 5:2018cv00598
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Martinez
Defendant:
J. Lewis, Lawrence Gamboa, R Binkele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Lewis et al
as 1:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Martinez
Defendant:
J. Lewis, Lawrence Gamboa, R. Binkele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Dixon et al
as 2:2017cv01240
Plaintiff:
Roy Diaz
Defendant:
N. Dixon, T. Farris, S. Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
