Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Jones v. L3 Harris et al
as 6:2024cv06127
Plaintiff:
Tedric K. Jones
Defendant:
L3 Harris and City of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones, Jr. v. Bacon et al
as 1:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
Brian K Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Erik W Bacon, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., Ryder Transportation Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Pan v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv04552
Plaintiff:
Arlene Pan
Defendant:
Vincent K. Jones, Universal Logistics of Virginia, LLC (improperly pled as Big E Transportation LLC) and Estes Leasing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. Free & Accepted Masons
as 6:2023cv06143
Plaintiff:
Tedric K. Jones
Defendant:
Free & Accepted Masons, L3 Harris Communications and Level 3 Communications
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yunayev v. Hennessy et al
as 1:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Yunayev
Defendant:
Paul J. Hennessy, David K. Jones, Robert J. Mylod, Jr. and others
Nominal Defendant:
Vroom, Inc.
McDonough v. Hennessy et al
as 1:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
Brady McDonough
Defendant:
Paul J. Hennessy, David K. Jones, Robert J. Mylod, Jr. and others
Nominal Defendant:
Vroom, Inc.
Rainey v. Hennessy et al
as 1:2021cv06933
Plaintiff:
Julie Rainey
Defendant:
Paul J. Hennessy, David K. Jones, Patricia Moran and others
Hudda v. Vroom, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03296
Defendant:
David K. Jones, Vroom, Inc. and Paul J. Hennessy
Plaintiff:
Arif Hudda
Petitioner:
Rhondda Cynon Taf Pension Fund
Holbrook v. Vroom, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02551
Defendant:
David K. Jones, Vroom, Inc. and Paul J. Hennessy
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Holbrook
Petitioner:
Rhondda Cynon Taf Pension Fund
Zawatsky et al v. Vroom, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02477
Plaintiff:
Catherine Zawatsky and Richard Zawatsky
Defendant:
Vroom, Inc., Paul J. Hennessy and David K. Jones
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
