Cases 1 - 10 of 684
Aitken v. Dixon et al
as 3:2025cv00009
Defendant:
Sergeant Robinson, Warden Chris Lane, Ricky Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Aitken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fenandez-Morales v. Benson et al
as 3:2024cv00550
Defendant:
Jhon Keast, M. Avram, Bergren and others
Plaintiff:
Yoandy Fernandez-Moralez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas Williams v. City of Fort Wayne, et al
as 24-3122
Defendant:
CITY OF FORT WAYNE, INDIANA and BOYCE J. BALLINGER
Plaintiff:
LUCAS K. WILLIAMS
Rogers v. Reichard, et al.
as 24-6701
Defendant:
M. DRAKE, Sergeant, King County Jail, SEATTLE AND KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, CHU, Corrections Officer, King County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
RAY CLARENCE ROGERS
Rogers v. Taylor, et al.
as 24-6695
Defendant:
SHERGILL, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, EDWARD NORMAN, Food Services Supervisor for King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, S. CHARLESTON, Corrections Program Specialist and others
Plaintiff:
RAY CLARENCE ROGERS
James Turner, III v. Martin Bryant
as 24-7027
Defendant:
K. WILLIAMS, Unit Manager, R. EVANS, Lieutenant, JOSHUA BRANCH, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOPE TURNER, III
Anderson et al v. Williams et al
as 4:2024cv00497
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, A Perez and K Williams
Plaintiff:
Patricia Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chavez v. Herrick et al
as 1:2024cv01798
Defendant:
T. Ortiz, C.P. Butts, D. Simms and others
Plaintiff:
Jaxon Reyes Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv05287
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, LAURA K. WILLIAMS, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
JUSTIN ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
