Cases 1 - 10 of 31
HARRIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv01350
Defendant:
OFFICER MICHAEL SPICER, OFFICER THOMAS LICIARDELLO, OFFICER BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPLE v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv00051
Defendant:
OFFICER MICHAEL SPICER, OFFICER THOMAS LICIARDELLO, OFFICER BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SAMPLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv00412
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WARREN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BETTS , LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPELLONE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv03149
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAMPELLONE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL SPICER , PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv01603
Plaintiff:
FRANK DAVIS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00833
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CLARK
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGHEE et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00832
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL MCGHEE and ELIGA MCGHEE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAPUSNIAK v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv06344
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE KAPUSNIAK
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
BRAME v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
CHESTER BRAME
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv06038
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
