Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kaur v. Garland
as 22-218
Petitioner:
NARINDERJIT KAUR, KARAMJIT SINGH and NAVJOT KAUR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. 4 Pardo Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00334
Defendant:
DVL Express Inc, Accutrac Capital, Accutrac Capital also known as eCapital Freight Factoring Inc as assignee of Karamjit Singh doing business as KP Trucking and others
Plaintiff:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Singh v. Sessions
as 18-563
Petitioner:
Karamjit Singh
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Karamjit Singh v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71914
Petitioner:
KARAMJIT SINGH
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
J & J Sports Productions Inc. v. Kaur et al
as 7:2017cv04237
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Inc.
Defendant:
Inderjit Kaur and Karamjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite - Theft of Satellite Communications
Singh v. Sessions
as 17-729
Petitioner:
Karamjit Singh and Sukhwinder Kaur
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
7 Eleven Inc v. Karamjeet Sodhi, et al
as 17-1262
Plaintiff - Appellee:
7 ELEVEN INC
Defendant - Appellant:
KARAMJEET SODHI
Defendant - Appellee:
MANJINDER SINGH, KARAMJIT SINGH and DOES 1 THROUGH 50 INCLUSIVE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
