Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MORGAN et al v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. MORGAN
Defendant:
KAREN FISCHER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Department of Social Services et al
as 1:2023cv10553
Plaintiff:
Jesus Torres
Defendant:
Department of Social Services, Karen Fischer, Jeannine Locicero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
HARDISON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARDISON
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, MATT LEOHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDISON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARDISON
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, MATT LEOHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019oe01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019oe01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kersten v. State of California Franchise Tax Board, et al
as 2:2016cv00309
Defendant:
State of California Franchise Tax Board, California Department of Consumer Affairs, Dental Board of California and others
Plaintiff:
Kersten and Timothy A. Kersten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
