Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Hughes v. Centennial Bank
as 4:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Karen Hughes
Defendant:
Centennial Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Edward v. McIntosh County, et al.
as 6:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Frank Edward, Jr.
Defendant:
McIntosh County, et al.,, Kevin Ledbetter, Monica Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Bryning et al
as 6:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duane Butler
Defendant:
David Bryning, Karen Hughes, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ammar Harris v. County of Clark, et al
as 23-15218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF CLARK, STEVEN B. WOLFSON, KATHLEEN E. DELANEY and others
Harris v. County of Clark et al
as 2:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
County of Clark, Steven B. Wolfson, Kathleen Delaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Tucker v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH CORNELIUS TUCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BAYSIDE STATE PRISON, JOHN POWELL, Administrator/Warden, in his official and individual capacities and others
Defendant:
KAREN HUGHES, C.R.A.F. Administratorm in her official and individual capacities
Reyna v. Parsley Energy Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10453
Defendant:
William Browning, Jerry Windlinger, David Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Reyna
Poole v. Parsley Energy Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10456
Defendant:
William Browning, Jerry Windlinger, David Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Poole
Prinzel v. Parsley Energy Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10877
Defendant:
William Browning, Jerry Windlinger, David Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Prinzel
Gebhardt v. Parsley Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10793
Defendant:
William Browning, A.R. Alameddine, Jerry Windlinger and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Gebhardt
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
