Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Robledo v. The Bantry Group Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv16483
Plaintiff:
Jorge Robledo
Defendant:
The Bantry Group Corporation a corporation, individually doing business as Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Wexford Health Sources, Inc., George Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hackney et al
as 3:2021cv03197
Plaintiff:
Reginald Earl Brown
Defendant:
Katie Hackney, Abdur Nawoor, George Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2021cv03054
Defendant:
Katie Hackney, Megan Eggimann, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Jefferies et al
as 3:2021cv03006
Defendant:
Katy Hackney, Rob Jefferies and Daniel Clarke
Plaintiff:
Antonio Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2020cv03312
Defendant:
Katy Hackney, Rob Jeffreys and Daniel Clarke
Plaintiff:
Jay A Hanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Blanchard v. John Baldwin, et al
as 20-2178
Defendant / Appellee:
ABDUR NAWOOR, Doctor, JOHN BALDWIN, IDOC Acting Director, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO L. BLANCHARD
Stapleton v. Nawoor et al
as 3:2020cv03002
Defendant:
Abdur Nawoor, Shelith Hansbro, Katie Hackney and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. Jo et al
as 3:2019cv03190
Plaintiff:
Walter W Norman
Defendant:
. Jo, Unknown Medical and Security Staff Members, Robert Braco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nettles v. Nawoor et al
as 3:2019cv03108
Defendant:
Megan Eggimann, Abdur Nawoor, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Glendon Nettles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2019cv03070
Defendant:
Ritz, Abdur Nawoor, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Carl Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
