Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 61 - 70 of 315
BURNETT v. BUTTS
as 1:2018cv01781
Petitioner: DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MICHEAU v. BUTTS
as 1:2018cv01711
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: ROBERT MICHEAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2018cv01612
Defendant: ANDREW BEGUHN, KEITH BUTTS, SCOTT FITCH and others
Plaintiff: LEDON TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Butt et al
as 3:2018cv00371
Plaintiff: Richard Kelly
Defendant: Keith Butt, Jennifer Smith and Ms Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. BUTTS
as 1:2018cv01319
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: CHARLES JONES
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HATTON v. BUTTS
as 1:2018cv01015
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LATHAM v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2018cv01010
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS and NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner: LARRY EUGENE LATHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PERRY v. BUTTS
as 1:2018cv00869
Defendant: KEITH BUTTS
Plaintiff: JASON SETH PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUNNELL v. BUTTS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00772
Plaintiff: RODERICK BUNNELL
Defendant: KEITH BUTTS, GIBSON and JENNY GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENLEY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv00736
Defendant: KEITH BUTTS, WENDY KNIGHT, THE SACRED SPIRITUAL ADVISOR and others
Plaintiff: TONY HENLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?