Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Knox et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11695
Plaintiff: Thomas Knox, Rosemarie Knox and Bayer Cropscience Inc., Successor in interest to Amchem Products, Inc.
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alliance Laundry Systems LLC Individually and as successor-in-interest to American Laundry Machinery Co., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Columbia Boiler Company, Crane Co., Crosby Valve, LLC and others
Cross Claimant: General Electric Company
Interested Party: Defendants Liaison Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Brindell et al v. Carlisle Industrial Brake and Friction Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01075
Plaintiff: John Brindell, Sr., Connie Dupay, Carolyn Brindell and others
Defendant: Union Carbide Corp., Strick Trailers LLC, Meritor Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRADLEY et al v. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv02513
Defendant: BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, LLC, AURORA PUMP, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cross Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER LLC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER CO., INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN BRADLEY and KENNETH E. BRADLEY
Cross Claimant: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. and A.W. CHESTERTON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Breakell v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00583
Defendant: Continental Automotive Systems Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., Maremont Corp. and others
Plaintiff: Adam M. Breakell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Erhardt v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01327
Defendant: Standard Motor Products, Inc., Mazda Motor of America Inc., Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Helmut Erhardt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dugger et al v. McCormick et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03912
Plaintiff: Dugger, John Dugger, Jr., Melody Natishin and others
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, Hampshire Industries, Inc., The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and others
Cross Defendant: Eaton Hydraulics, Inc., Jenkins Valves, Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: The William Powell Company
3Rd Party Defendant: Manville Trust Personal Injury Settlement Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
MacCormack et al v. The Adel Wiggins Group et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00414
Defendant: CSR, LTD., Paccar, Inc., Crane Co and others
Plaintiff: Karen Loftus, Berj Hovsepian, Nancy Broudy and others
Cross Claimant: Warren Pumps, LLC
Cross Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Crane Co., Cleaver Brooks Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
MUSSELMAN et al v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv91457
Plaintiff: CHARLES MUSSELMAN, CHARLES MUSSELMAN, CHARLES MUSSELMAN and others
Defendant: AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ARVINMERITOR, INC., ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
MUSSELMAN et al v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv01052
Plaintiff: CHARLES MUSSELMAN, CHARLES MUSSELMAN, CHARLES MUSSELMAN and others
Defendant: AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ARVINMERITOR, INC., ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
BEAM v. JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv83110
Plaintiff: JOSEPH D. BEAM, SR. and JOSEPH D. BEAM, SR.
Defendant: JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INC., OWEN-ILINOIS GLASS CO., THE STEBBING COMPANY and others
Respondent: PFIZER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?