Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Johnson et al v. Lidl US LLC et al
as 6:2023cv05817
Plaintiff:
Gina Johnson and Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
Lidl US LLC, Lidl US Operations LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv01376
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Doory et al
as 1:2022cv00588
Petitioner:
Thomas Isiah Davis
Respondent:
Timothy J. Doory, Steven Crowley, Thomas Ports and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2021cv00013
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DETENTION TACTICAL TEAM OFFICERS and OFFICER J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spence et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03393
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson and Angela Spence
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY CENTRAL JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00889
Defendant:
SERGEANT TAYLOR, GUILFORD COUNTY CENTRAL JAIL, GUILFORD COUNTY CENTRAL JAIL TACTICAL TEAM and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Johnson v. Clifton Gordy
as 20-1229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFTON J. GORDY
Johnson v. Gordy
as 1:2020cv00112
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
Clifton J. Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv
Johnson v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Chemours Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2019cv00834
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant:
MR. SMITH, JOHN DOE, MR. TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
