Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 674
US v. Kenneth Brown
as 24-6234
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: KENNETH LEE BROWN
Taylor v. Carbullido, et al.
as 24-1417
Plaintiff: KENNETH LEE TAYLOR
Defendant: J. CARBULLIDO, CCI Counselor; CSP-Solano, C. HODGERS, CCI Counselor; CSP-Solano, RAFAEL PULIDO, CCI Counselor; CSP-Solano and others
US v. Kenneth McBride
as 24-6069
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: KENNETH LEE MCBRIDE
McBride v. USA
as 5:2024cv00006
Petitioner: Kenneth Lee McBride
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Doss v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2023cv00522
Plaintiff: Kenneth Lee Doss
Defendant: David Jenkins, Joe Swaim, Ashley Sparks and others
Interested Party: H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Nickoson v. Rachael Baumgardner
as 23-7105
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENNETH LEE NICKOSON
Defendant / Appellee: RACHAEL BAUMGARDNER, RN, ALAN BARNETT, MD and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
Defendant: GEORGE TRENT, Warden and KEVIN HALLORAN, Chairman of the Board
GROSSER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13899
Plaintiff: KENNETH LEE GROSSER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doss v. Hienricy
as 4:2023cv00392
Petitioner: Kenneth Lee Doss
Respondent: Mike Hienricy
Interested Party: Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANTHONY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12458
Plaintiff: KENNETH LEE ANTHONY
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PORTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11462
Plaintiff: KENNETH LEE PORTER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?