Cases 1 - 10 of 14
United States of America v. $45,000.00 in US Currency
as 3:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$45,000.00 in U.S. Currency and $45,000.00 in US Currency
Claimant:
Kenneth McClain
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
MCCLAIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17936
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MCCLAIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EDVALSON v. MCCLAIREN et al
as 5:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SCOT EDVALSON
Defendant:
CALEB MCCLAIREN, DANIELS, GLEN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EHRLICH v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MATTHEW EHRLICH
Defendant:
GREGORY C DOZIER, GLEN JOHNSON, JAMES HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KERCH v. JOHNSON, et al.
as 5:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP NATHAN KERCH
Defendant:
GLENN JOHNSON, KENNETH MCCLAIN and JOHN/JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Phillips, Jr. v. Dooly SP Warden, et al
as 16-16854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MAUNEL PHILLIPS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DOOLY SP WARDEN, RICHARD OSTER, Taylor Regional Hospital, TEMPLE and others
ROBERTS v. GRAMIAK et al
as 5:2014cv00248
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH ROBERTS
Defendant:
TOM GRAMIAK, KENNETH MCCLAIN, WALTER BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. Cain et al
as 2:2014cv01452
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McClain
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MINES v. BARBER et al
as 7:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ALLEN MINES
Defendant:
ANTHONY BARBER, Andre Yancy, WESTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Resch, et al v. Krapf's Coaches Inc
as 13-3947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANITA M. KING, JOSEPH RESCH, SCOTT BEINLICH and others
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELIZABETH MCNAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
KRAPF'S COACHES INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
