Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Richardson v. Nelsen
as 1:2023cv06962
Petitioner: Fred Joseph Richardson, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Kenneth Nelsen and Kenneth Nelsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woody v. Broad River C.I.
as 2:2023cv03201
Petitioner: Christopher A Woody
Respondent: Warden Kenneth Nelsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graves v. Nelsen et al
as 9:2023cv01172
Plaintiff: Maurice Graves
Defendant: Kenneth Nelsen, Sgt. Moore and Sgt. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Vernon Goodwin v. Kenneth Nelsen
as 22-6761
Petitioner / Appellant: VERNON GOODWIN
Respondent / Appellee: KENNETH NELSEN, Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Wise v. Perkins et al
as 8:2022cv01468
Plaintiff: Anthony M Wise
Defendant: Miles Perkins, Steven Fleshman, Christopher Campisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Priest v. Stirling et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02878
Petitioner: Quantae Priest
Respondent: Bryan Stirling and Kenneth Nelsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vernon Goodwin v. Bryan Stirling et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv02051
Petitioner: Vernon Goodwin
Respondent: Bryan Stirling and Kenneth Nelsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Nelsen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv01226
Petitioner: Marquis Robinson
Respondent: Kenneth Nelsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clinton Folkes v. Warden Nelsen
as 21-6217
Respondent: WARDEN NELSON and KENNETH NELSEN
Petitioner: CLINTON FOLKES
Cook v. Nelsen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2020cv00173
Petitioner: Jeron Alondo Cook
Respondent: Warden Kenneth Nelsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?