Cases
Edward Banks, et al v. Quincy Booth, et al
as 21-5033
Defendant / Appellant: Lennard Johnson, in his official capacity as Warden, D.C. Dept. Corrections and Quincy L. Booth, in his official capacity as Director of the District of Columbia Dept of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellee: Edward Banks, Eric Smith, D'Angelo Phillips and others
Interested Party: United States
Amicus Curiae: Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center
Edward Banks, et al v. Quincy Booth, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5216
Defendant / Appellant: Lennard Johnson, in his official capacity as Warden, D.C. Dept. Corrections and Quincy L. Booth, in his official capacity as Director of the District of Columbia Dept of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellee: Edward Banks, Eric Smith, D'Angelo Phillips and others
Interested Party: United States
Grissom (ID 33728) v. Bell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv03163
Defendant: Devin Flowers, Christopher Loya, Raymond Stiggens and others
Plaintiff: Richard Grissom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS et al v. BOOTH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00849
Defendant: QUINCY L. BOOTH and LENNARD JOHNSON
Plaintiff: EDWARD BANKS, ERIC SMITH, D'ANGELO PHILLIPS and others
Petitioner: FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS LABOR COMMITTEE
Interested Party: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32282
Plaintiff: CORTNEY KEON JACKSON
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. $14,202.67 in United States Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01018
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $14,202.67 in United States Currency
Claimant: Michael Keon Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?