Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv07455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
In re Robinhood Outage Litigation
as 3:2020cv01626
Plaintiff:
Daniel Beckman, Joseph Gwaltney, Jared Leith and others
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial, LLC, Robinhood Markets, Inc. and Robinhood Securities, LLC
Interested Party:
Alexander Adame, Colin Prendergast, Jason Steinberg and others
Claimant:
Mohammed Ali Abdul Kader
Not Classified By Court:
Ally Financial Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01462
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Kevin Russell Meyer v. William Knipp
as 2:2013cv04771
Respondent:
William Knipp
Petitioner:
Kevin Russell Meyer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02843
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America et al v. Kadena Pacific, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05487
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Kadena Pacific, Inc., Safeco Insurance company of America, Prime Plumbing Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Meyer v. Smith et al
as 2:2009cv01527
Plaintiff:
Kevin Russell Meyer
Defendant:
Christopher Smith, R. Hawkins, C. Lovett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drew Kevin Russell v. Richard Hernandez
as 8:2008cv00038
Petitioner:
Drew Kevin Russell
Respondent:
Richard Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Hernandez
as 3:2008cv00009
Petitioner:
Drew Kevin Russell
Respondent:
Richard Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
