Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv07455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boyer v. Shirley et al
as 6:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Boyer
Defendant:
Allen Shirley, Bryan Shepherd, Sharita J. Liner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akhtar et al v. Lynch et al
as 2:2016cv03991
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc., William Dempsey, Loretta E. Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Javed Akhtar and Kabir Javaid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Russell et al v. Joplin Police Department et al
as 3:2014cv05049
Defendant:
Joplin Police Department , City of Joplin, Missouri , Tyler Christensen and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Russell , Julissa Russell and Brant Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ABRAM v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
RITA ABRAM
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CHARLES E. MARTIN, JR., CHRISTOPHER WILBURN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RUSSELL v. TOWN OF WHITESTOWN, INDIANA
as 1:2007cv00526
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RUSSELL and KEVIN RUSSELL
Defendant:
TOWN OF WHITESTOWN, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
