Cases 21 - 30 of 199
James Courtney v. Kim Butler, et al
as 17-2194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES COURTNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK and TIM CHRISTIANSON, Chief of Parole
Matthews v. Butler et al
as 3:2017cv00366
Plaintiff:
Jerel Matthews
Defendant:
Kim Butler, Dr. Trost, Gail Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marlon Watford v. Thomas LaFond, et al
as 17-1436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON L. WATFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS LAFOND, SARAH WOOLLEY, Officer, KIM BUTLER, Warden and others
Scott Peters v. Donald Wilkerson, et al
as 17-1068
Petitioner:
SCOTT PETERS
Respondent:
DONALD G. WILKERSON, Magistrate Judge and NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge
Party-in-Interest:
KIM BUTLER, Warden, JOHN TROST, Doctor, JOHN R. BALDWIN, IDOC Director in his official capacity only and others
Teaone Bell v. Kim Butler, et al
as 16-4052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEAONE S. BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, KENT BROOKMAN, Lieutenant and JASON HART
Winston v. Butler et al
as 3:2016cv01273
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Winston
Defendant:
Kim Butler , John Doe, Robert Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kentes West v. Michael Atchison, et al
as 16-3985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENTES WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. ATCHISON, Warden, CEDRIC A. MCDONNOUGH, Correctional Officer, Menard Correctional Center, AARON HOOD, Correctional Officer, Menard Correctional Center and others
Phipps v. Butler et al
as 3:2016cv03292
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Phipps
Defendant:
Kim Butler, Jeff Korte, Wexford Health Source Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kentes West v. Monica Nippe, et al
as 16-3702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENTES WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
MONICA NIPPE, KIM BUTLER and S. HILL
Williams v. Butler
as 1:2016cv09735
Petitioner:
William Williams
Respondent:
Kim Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
