Cases 1 - 10 of 105
RUTHRAUFF v. CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Defendant:
SARA BEDWELL, CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC., STEPHANY LYNNE RILEY and others
Plaintiff:
MARK RUTHRAUFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALLANTINE v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY W. CALLANTINE
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, LISA WOLFE, KIM HOBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, LAUREN CUPP, CHANTELL KNEEP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Brandon v. Kim Hobson
as 23-1642
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT BRANDON
Defendant / Appellee:
KIM HOBSON
Carl Drucker, II v. Barbara Riggs, et al
as 23-1491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL J. DRUCKER, II
Defendant / Appellee:
BARBARA RIGGS, NAVEEN RAJOLI, KIM HOBSON and others
ZAMARRON v. CENTURION, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEE ZAMARRON
Defendant:
CENTURION, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, SAMUEL J. BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
LE'MERE JONES
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRENCH v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
ROMAN L FRENCH and ROMAN LAMONT FRENCH
Defendant:
WARDEN, BYRD, KIM HOBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Roman L French and Roman Lamont French
Defendant:
Warden, Byrd, Kim Hobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REYNOLDS v. BYRD et al
as 1:2022cv02152
Plaintiff:
STEVEN REYNOLDS
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. BYRD, KIM HOBSON, JOHN DOE, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
