Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Francis Dupont, Jr. v. Frank Sklarsky, et al
as 09-2122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS DUPONT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK SKLARSKY, in his capacity as Chairman of the Traditional Kodak Retirement Income Plan Committee, ROBERT L. BERMAN, in his capcity as a member of the Traditional Kodak Retirement Income Plan Committee, ROBERT J. LEONARD, in his capacity as a member of the Traditional Kodak Retirement Income Plan Committee and others
Anderson et al v. Eastman Kodak Company et al
as 6:2009cv06106
Plaintiff:
Sally P. Anderson, Sally P. Anderson, Sally P. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Eastman Kodak Company, Kodak Retirement Income Plan and Kodak Retirement Income Plan Committee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FISH et al v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY et al
as 3:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. FISH, RICHARD J. GAUDY, ANGELO M. AGUILERA and others
Defendant:
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN and KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scanlan v. Kodak Retirement Income Plan et al
as 6:2008cv06195
Plaintiff:
Michael Scanlan and Michael Scanlan
Defendant:
Kodak Retirement Income Plan, Kodak Retirement Income Plan Committee and Eastman Kodak Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DUPONT v. SKLARSKY et al
as 3:2008cv01724
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS DUPONT, JR
Defendant:
FRANK SKLARSKY, ROBERT L. BERMAN, ROBERT J. LEONARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kickham Hanley P.C. v. Kodak Retirement Income Plan et al
as 6:2008cv06087
Plaintiff:
Kickham Hanley P.C.
Defendant:
Kodak Retirement Income Plan, Trustee of the Kodak Retirement Income Plan and Kodak Retirement Income Plan Committee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hall v. Kodak Retirement Income Plan et al
as 6:2007cv06169
Plaintiff:
Peggy A. Hall
Defendant:
Kodak Retirement Income Plan, Kodak Retirement Income Plan, Kodak Retirement Income Plan Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
