Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Kohler Co. et al
as 1:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club
Defendant:
LSP Products Group, Inc. and Kohler Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOUCY v. BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
TAMMIE D SOUCY
Defendant:
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION, HARLEY DAVIDSON INC, JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WBIP, LLC v. Kohler Co.
as 1:2011cv10374
Plaintiff:
WBIP, LLC
Defendant:
Kohler Co.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Electric Insurance Company v. BrassCraft Manufacturing Company et al
as 1:2010cv00435
Defendant:
BrassCraft Manufacturing Company, Kohler Co., Inc., Lakeside Plumbing & Heating, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Electric Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Williams v. Sears Roebuck & Co. et al
as 3:2009cv01415
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Williams
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co., Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Kunesh v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., et al
as 1:2009cv00017
Plaintiff:
Gina H. Kunesh
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Horrocks v. Sears, Roebuck & Co et al
as 1:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
Craig Horrocks
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILSON v. SEARS ROEBUCK & CO et al
as 2:2009cv00011
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY J WILSON
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK & CO, DEERE & CO, TECUMSEH PRODUCTS CO and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Heidi R.S. Dallal v. Sears Roebuck and Co. et al
as 1:2008cv11926
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co., Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Plaintiff:
Heidi R.S. Dallal
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
